You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports >>
2004 >>
[2004] NZBORARp 32
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Documents
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Holidays Amendment Bill (Consistent) [2004] NZBORARp 32 (27 August 2004)
Last Updated: 19 March 2021
Holidays Amendment Bill
27 August 2004
Attorney-General
Legal Advice
Consistency With The New Zealand Bill Of Rights Act
1990:
Holidays Amendment Bill
- We
have considered whether the Holidays Amendment Bill (the Bill) (PCO 5938/7) is
consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act
1990 (the Bill of Rights
Act). A ‘near final’ copy of the Bill arrived late on Thursday 26
August 2004, and we understand
that the Bill will be considered by Cabinet on
Monday 30 August 2004.
- The
Bill aims to address the unintended consequences of the Holidays Act 2003. The
Bill seeks to:
- clarify an
employee’s entitlement to be paid for working on a public holiday. Under
the Bill an employee must be paid the greater
of the portion of his or her: (a)
relevant daily pay that relates to the time actually worked on the day less
certain penal rates,
plus half that amount again, or (b) relevant daily pay that
relates to the time actually worked. The penal rates to be excluded under
(a)
are limited to those that are designed to compensate the employee for working on
a particular day (for example, weekend rates);
- provide that
existing employment agreements must be amended by the specified date to include
a provision relating to pay for work
on public holidays, as outlined above;
- provide a
transitional provision so that where an existing collective employment agreement
already incorporates time and a half or
better rates for public holidays into a
composite pay rate, the employer can continue to pay an employee their regular
pay for working
on a public holiday until the specified date.
- provide that
where an employee is sick or bereaved on a public holiday on which he or she was
scheduled to work, the day should be
treated as an unworked public holiday
(rather than as sick or bereavement leave) and the employee is to be paid his or
her relevant
daily pay;
- enable
employers, in certain circumstances, to require an employee to produce proof of
sickness or injury (eg a medical certificate)
at any point after the employer
has been notified of the employee’s intention to take the leave (currently
employers can only
require medical certificates where the sickness or injury
lasts for 3 or more days).
- We
have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the Bill of Rights
Act.
- In
accordance with your instructions we attach a copy of this opinion for referral
to the Minister of Justice. A copy of the opinion
is also attached for referral
to the Minister of Labour, if you
agree.
Roger Palairet Acting Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal
Counsel
|
Joanna Gould Senior Legal Adviser Bill of Rights/Human Rights
Team
|
CC Minister of Justice
Minister of Labour
In addition to the general disclaimer for all documents on this website,
please note the following: This advice was prepared to assist
the
Attorney-General to determine whether a report should be made to Parliament
under s 7 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
in relation to the Holidays
Amendment Bill. It should not be used or acted upon for any other purpose. The
advice does no more than
assess whether the Bill complies with the minimum
guarantees contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. The release of this
advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all
aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a
general waiver of legal
professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst care has
been taken to ensure that
this document is an accurate reproduction of the
advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the
Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omissions.
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZBORARp/2004/32.html