You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports >>
2007 >>
[2007] NZBORARp 54
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Documents
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Customs and Excise Amendment Bill (No 3 (Consistent) (Section 19(1)) [2007] NZBORARp 54 (21 November 2007)
Last Updated: 5 January 2019
Customs and Excise Amendment Bill (No 3)
21 November 2007 Attorney-General LEGAL ADVICE
CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990:
CUSTOMS AND EXCISE AMENDMENT BILL (NO 3)
- We
have considered whether the Customs and Excise Amendment Bill (No 3) (the
"Bill") (PCO 8240/9) is consistent with the New Zealand
Bill of Rights Act 1990
("Bill of Rights Act"). We understand that the Bill will be considered by the
Cabinet Legislation Committee
at its meeting on Thursday, 22 November 2007.
- We
have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act.
- The
Bill seeks to amend the Customs and Excise Act 1996 (the "Act") to:
- enhance
statutory appeal and review rights in relation to the forfeiture and seizure
regime contained in Part XIV of the Act;
- provide greater
flexibility for Customs to deal with ad-hoc arrivals and departures; and
- remedy
legislative inconsistencies relating to the illegal manufacture of tobacco.
- Clause
14 of the Bill (Regulations) seeks to amend section 286 of the Act to ensure
that regulations exempting the manufacturing and
processing of goods from the
requirement that it take place in a Customs controlled area can be made subject
to extensive conditions.
Under new section 286(1A)(d), these could include
conditions limiting the age of any person involved in the manufacture or use of
the goods. The making of regulations that distinguish between people on the
basis of age may, depending on the nature of those resulting
regulations, give
rise to an issue of discrimination under section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights
Act.
- Section
6 of the Bill of Rights Act requires that wherever an enactment can be given a
meaning that is consistent with the rights
and freedoms contained in the Bill of
Rights Act, that meaning must be preferred to any other meaning. We are,
therefore, of the
view that new section 286(1A)(d) would be interpreted as
authorising the making of regulations that are consistent with the Bill
of
Rights Act.
Jeff Orr
Chief Legal Counsel
Office of Legal Counsel
|
Stuart Beresford
Acting Manager, Bill of Rights/Human Rights
Public Law
|
In addition to the general disclaimer for all documents on this website,
please note the following: This advice was prepared to assist
the
Attorney-General to determine whether a report should be made to Parliament
under s 7 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
in relation to the Customs
and Excise Amendment Bill (No 3). It should not be used or acted upon for any
other purpose. The advice
does no more than assess whether the Bill complies
with the minimum guarantees contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. The
release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General
agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release
constitute a general waiver
of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst
care has been taken to
ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of
the advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice
nor
the Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omissions.
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZBORARp/2007/54.html