You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports >>
2013 >>
[2013] NZBORARp 23
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Documents
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Health and Safety (Pike River Implementation) Bill (Consistent) (Section 21) [2013] NZBORARp 23 (12 June 2013)
Last Updated: 7 April 2019
Health and Safety (Pike River Implementation) Bill
12 June 2013 Attorney-General
Legal Advice
Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act
1990: Health and Safety (Pike River Implementation) Bill
- We
have considered whether the Health and Safety (Pike River Implementation) Bill
(PCO 17400/3.0) (‘the Bill’) is consistent
with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (‘the Bill of
Rights Act’). We understand
that the Bill will be considered by the
Cabinet Business Committee at its meeting on Monday, 17 June 2013.
- The
Royal Commission into the Pike River Coal Mine Tragedy made a number
of
recommendations, following its finding that New Zealand’s
regulation of health and safety in the mining industry was ineffective.
The
Bill, which is an omnibus bill, seeks to implement a number of those
recommendations by: establishing a new workplace health
and safety agency;
amending the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992; and creating a new Mines
Rescue Trust Act 2013. These
changes form part of a new mining regulatory
regime with the objective of improving safety in the mining industry.
- We
have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. In reaching
this view, we
considered whether the Bill is consistent with the right to be secure against
unreasonable search and seizure.
- Section
21 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right of everyone to be secure against
unreasonable search and seizure, whether of
the person, property, correspondence
or otherwise.
- The
following clauses of the Bill potentially engage section 21:
- Clause 25, new
section 19Y: empowers mine health and safety representatives to enter and
inspect a mine;
- Clause 25, new
section 19Z: empowers the mine health and safety representatives on entering a
mining operation to examine and copy
documents relevant to health and safety;
and
- Clause 46:
provides for powers of entry into premises (other than a dwellinghouse or a
marae) and inspection of certain documents,
and empowers an authorised person to
require a person to provide information, and to assist with the reproduction of
that information.
These powers may only be exercised in order to ascertain
whether the requirements of any regulations relating to the Mines Rescue
Trust
Board levy are being met.
- In
assessing whether the relevant provisions are reasonable, we have considered
whether they serve a sufficiently important purpose
and whether the intrusion
caused is no more than is necessary to achieve that purpose.
- The
new mining regulatory regime serves the important objective of improving safety
in the mining industry. The search and seizure
powers appear to be necessary for
the proper functioning of that regime. New sections 19Y and 19Z enable mine
health and safety representatives
to carry out their statutory functions,
including investigating complaints from mine workers regarding health and
safety, and monitoring
measures taken by mine operators that are relevant to
health and safety. Clause 46 provides necessary powers for collecting a levy
from mining operators. The levy enables the recovery of costs incurred by the
Mines Rescue Trust Board in performing its statutory
functions.
- The
privacy intrusion is modest given that the premises in question are all
commercial premises where the reasonable expectation of
privacy is less than for
dwellinghouses or marae, which are specifically excluded from the search power.
We note that mining is a
highly regulated industry, in part due to the need to
prevent hazardous outcomes, and this also reduces the reasonable expectation
of
privacy.
- For
these reasons we have concluded that the search and seizure powers contained
within the Bill are reasonable, and the Bill appears
to be consistent with the
rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act.
Jeff Orr
Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel
Disclaimer
In addition to the general disclaimer for all documents on this website,
please note the following:
This advice was prepared to assist the Attorney-General to determine whether
a report should be made to Parliament under s 7 of the
New Zealand Bill of
Rights Act 1990 in relation to the Health and Safety (Pike River Implementation)
Bill. It should not be used
or acted upon for any other purpose. The advice does
no more than assess whether the Bill complies with the minimum guarantees
contained
in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice
should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees
with all
aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal
professional privilege in respect of this or any
other matter. Whilst care has
been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the
advice provided to the Attorney-General,
neither the Ministry of Justice nor the
Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omissions.
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZBORARp/2013/23.html