You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports >>
2018 >>
[2018] NZBORARp 38
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Documents
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Ngati Rangi Claims Settlement Bill (Consistent) (Sections 19, 27(3)) [2018] NZBORARp 38 (26 March 2018)
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports
[Index]
[Search]
[Download]
[Help]
Ngati Rangi Claims Settlement Bill (Consistent) (Sections 19, 27(3)) [2018] NZBORARp 38 (26 March 2018)
Last Updated: 3 January 2019
26 March 2018
Attorney-General
Tēnā koe
Ngāti Rangi Claims Settlement Bill (v 5.0) - Consistency with the New
Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
Our Ref: ATT395/280
- We
have considered the above Bill for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of
Rights Act 1990 (“the Bill of Rights Act”).
We advise that the Bill
appears to be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act.
- The
Bill will effect a final settlement of the Ngāti Rangi historical claims as
defined in the Bill.1 It provides for acknowledgements
and an apology to Ngāti Rangi, as well as for cultural and commercial
redress. Measures for
cultural redress include:
- 2.1 protocols
for Crown minerals and taonga tūturu;
- 2.2 acknowledgement
of statements of association made by Ngāti Rangi,
- 2.3 a deed of
recognition for certain areas administered by the Department of
Conservation;
- 2.4 declaration
of official geographic names;
- 2.5 the vesting
of certain properties in Ngāti Rangi;
- 2.6 a joint
management scheme for Whangaehu River, known to Ngāti Rangi
as
Te Waiū-o-Te-Ika; and
2.7 Te Tāpora, an overlay classification applying to a forest sanctuary
area which requires the New Zealand Conservation Authority
and relevant
Conservation Boards to have regard to statements of values and protection
1 Clause 13 defines Ngāti Rangi,
clause 14 defines historical claims.
principles outlined by Ngāti Rangi and trustees of Te Tōtarahoe o
Paerangi
Trust.
- The
rights or interests of persons not party to the statutory acknowledgement or the
deed of recognition are expressly not affected
by the
Bill.2
Whether s 19 at issue
- The
Bill will confer assets or rights on Ngāti Rangi that are not conferred on
other people. Notwithstanding that, the Bill does
not prima facie limit
the right to freedom from discrimination affirmed by s 19 of the Bill of Rights
Act. Discrimination arises only if there is
a difference in treatment on the
basis of one of the prohibited grounds of discrimination between those in
comparable circumstances.
In the context of this settlement, which addresses
specified historical claims brought by Ngāti Rangi, no other persons or
groups
who are not party to those claims are in comparable circumstances to the
recipients of the entitlements under the Bill. No differential
treatment for the
purpose of s 19 therefore arises by excluding others from the entitlements
conferred under the Bill.
- Clause
137 reserves a special right of access to protected sites transferred to the iwi
and hapū of Ngāti Rangi. This right
of access applies to Māori
for whom the protected site is of special cultural, historical or spiritual
significance. It is conceivable
this clause raises a s 19 issue if the protected
sites also have significance to non-Māori.
- However,
the reasoning in paragraph 4 above also applies to clause 137 and on that basis
s 19 is not infringed. To the extent s 19
might be engaged, any infringement is
justified by the objective of ensuring related claimant groups are not
prejudiced by the settlement
in situations where the negotiation of cultural and
commercial redress has to occur in a multi-iwi setting.
Privative clause
- Clause
15 of the Bill provides that the settlement of the historical claims is final.
It excludes the jurisdiction of any court, tribunal
or other judicial body to
consider: the historical claims, the deed of settlement, the Act itself, or the
redress provided under
the deed of settlement or this Act, other than in respect
of the interpretation or implementation of
- 7.1 the deed of
settlement; or
- 7.2 the Act
(when the Bill is passed into law).
- Legislative
determinations ought not conventionally to fall within the scope of judicial
review.3 However, to the extent any excluded matters
could be susceptible to judicial review, cl 15 constitutes a justified limit
under s 5
of the Bill of Rights Act on the right affirmed by s 27(2). Excluding
subsequent challenge is a legitimate incident of the negotiated
settlement of
claims.
2 Clauses 38 and 54.
3 Westco Lagan Ltd v Attorney-General [2000] NZHC 1350; [2001]
1 NZLR 40 (HC).
- To
the extent the exclusion of subsequent challenge could be said to limit a
claimant's minority rights under s 20 of the Bill of
Rights Act, this would be
justified on the same basis.
- The
United Nations Human Rights Committee upheld a similar exclusion under the 1992
Fisheries Settlement. The Committee found the
exclusion was consistent with arts
14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are
comparable to
ss 20 and 27(2) of the Bill of Rights
Act.4
Whether s 27(3) at issue
- Clause
24 of the Bill excludes damages or other forms of monetary compensation as a
remedy for a failure of the Crown to comply with
the taonga tūturu
protocol.
- This
clause may be seen to raise the issue of consistency with s 27(3) of the Bill of
Rights Act, namely the tight to bring civil
proceedings against the Crown and
have these heard according to the law in the same way as civil proceedings
between individuals.
However, cl 24 affects the substantive law and does not
fall within the ambit of s 27(3) of the Bill of Rights Act, which protects
procedural rights.5 Accordingly, no inconsistency
arises.
Review of this advice
- This
advice has been reviewed in accordance with Crown Law protocol by Helen Carrad,
Crown Counsel.
Debra Harris Crown Counsel
|
Noted
Hon David Parker
Attorney-General
/ /2018
|
4 Apirana Mahuika v New Zealand Communication
Number 547/1993 UN Doc CCPR/C/70/D/547/1993 (2000).
5 Westco Lagan Ltd v Attorney-General, above
n 3, at 55.
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZBORARp/2018/38.html