You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports >>
2019 >>
[2019] NZBORARp 32
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Documents
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
District Court (District Court Judges) Amendment Bill (Consistent) (Sections 25, 27) [2019] NZBORARp 32 (13 May 2019)
Last Updated: 7 August 2019
13 May 2019
Attorney-General
District Court (District Court Judges) Amendment Bill: Consistency with the New
Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
Our Ref: ATT395/293
- I
have considered the above Bill for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of
Rights Act 1990 (the Bill of Rights Act). I advise that
the Bill appears to be
consistent with the Bill of Rights Act. A copy of the draft of the Bill is
attached.
- The
Bill increases the maximum number of District Court Judges from 160 to 182 full
time equivalents. District Court Judges, as specified
in s 7(2) of the principal
Act, are the Chief District Court Judge, the Principal Family Court Judge, the
Principal Youth Court Judge,
and other District Court Judges. The change is
necessary because of the increase in workload for District Court Judges in
recent
years, and the expansion of the Youth Court jurisdiction to include
17-year olds.
- This
Bill does not engage the right to justice in s 27 of the Bill of Rights Act, or
the minimum standards of criminal procedure in
s 25 for those charged with an
offence. The Bill does not alter any procedures of the District Court, it simply
increases the number
of judges that will be available to deliver the
Court’s work. The Bill is therefore consistent with the Bill of Rights
Act.
Review of this advice
- This
advice has been reviewed in accordance with Crown Law protocol by Crown Counsel
Alison Todd.
Genevieve Taylor Crown Counsel
|
Noted
Hon David Parker
Attorney-General
/5/2019
|
5185025_DISTRICT COURT AMENDMENT BILLL - CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW
ZEALAN.._
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZBORARp/2019/32.html