New Zealand Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]
PARENTAL LEAVE AND EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION ACT 1987 - SECT 57
Procedures for settlement of parental leave complaints
57 Procedures for settlement of parental leave complaints
1 The procedures
for the settlement of a parental leave complaint shall be in accordance with
this section and sections 58 to 67 .
2 As soon as practicable after a
parental leave complaint arises, the employee shall submit the complaint to
the employee's immediate supervisor, affording the immediate supervisor an
opportunity to remedy the cause of the complaint, the intent being that it is
desirable, if the circumstances permit it, to settle the complaint rapidly and
as near as possible to the point of origin.
3 Where any such attempt at
settlement has failed, or where the complaint is of such a nature that a
direct discussion between the employee and the employee's immediate supervisor
would be inappropriate, the employee shall either— a) notify the branch
secretary or secretary or a duly authorised representative of any union to
which the employee belongs or could belong; or
b) where the employee elects
to act on his or her own behalf or to appoint an agent or barrister or
solicitor to act on his or her behalf, forthwith take the matter up, or
arrange for that agent, barrister, or solicitor, as the case may be, to take
up the matter on his or her behalf, with the employer or the representative of
the employer.
4 Where the person notified under subsection (3)(a)
considers that there is some substance in the parental leave complaint, that
person shall forthwith take the matter up with the employer or the
representative of the employer.
5 If the matter is not disposed of in
discussion with the employer or the representative of the employer, the
complaint shall be reduced to writing in a statement setting out all the facts
relied on. The statement shall establish the nature of the employee's
complaint, and of the issues, for all subsequent consideration of the case.
Note: 1980 No 162 s 35
NZLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback