NZLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

New Zealand Law Commission

You are here:  NZLII >> Databases >> New Zealand Law Commission >> Report >> R33 >> Part B

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]


Part B

Finance

The Law Commission is funded from money appropriated by Parliament.

For the year under review the Commission budgeted to operate at a deficit, funding the shortfall in income from its reserves. The Commission’s deficit budgeting strategy is designed to enable it to achieve its planned long-term operating level. The Commission’s reserves will be used in the coming year in a capital replacement programme and to meet part of its operating deficit. An increase in the annual appropriation may be necessary to enable the Commission to sustain its strategic operating goals.

In the 1994/95 year the Commission budgeted for operating expenditure of $3 725 034 of which $3 019 560 was to be provided by way of appropriation and $705 474 from other income and reserves.

The Commission’s actual operating expenditure was $3 349 214 of which $3 019 566 was by way of appropriation and $329 658 from other income and reserves.

The financial statements for the year ended 30 June 1995 follow.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY

We acknowledge responsibility for the preparation of these financial statements and for the judgments used herein.

We acknowledge responsibility for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of the Commission’s financial reporting.

In our opinion these annual financial statements fairly reflect the financial position and operations of the Law Commission for the year ended 30 June 1995.

K J Keith
J E Lett
President
Finance Manager

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 1995

Budget
$
Note
1995
$
1994
$

INCOME


3 019 560
Government grant
3 019 556
2 817 778
105 000
Interest received
218 852
152 334
9 000
Sale of publications
17 437
12 048
Miscellaneous
1 433
3 133 560
Total income
3 257 278
2 982 160

EXPENDITURE


1 968 554
Personnel
1 944 024
1 655 866
147 000
Research and consultation
130 133
164 684
160 000
Publications
51 748
121 913
130 000
Travel
110 587
120 097
189 000
Library
154 934
139 433
525 960
Rent and rates
498 597
505 186
8 400
Audit fees
7 000
7 000
153 120
Depreciation
146 410
143 839
283 000
Services and supplies
248 727
227 278
160 000
Professional services
57 054
120 577
3 725 034
Total Expenditure
3 349 214
3 205 873
(591 474)
Deficit for year 3/4
(91 936)
(223 713)

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE 1995

Budget
$
Note
1995
$
1994
$

CURRENT ASSETS


10 516
Bank of New Zealand
8 134
3 580
150 000
Call deposits
125 000
100 000
1 675 000
Short-term deposits 1
2 200 000
2 275 000
1 000
Accounts receivable
1 583
4 407
23 253
Prepayments
30 621
18 846
40 000
Interest receivable
41 342
42 134
15 000
Goods and services tax
10 899
16 438
1 914 769

2 417 579
2 460 405
277 762
FIXED ASSETS 2
257 888
380 882
2 192 531
TOTAL ASSETS
2 675 467
2 841 287

CURRENT LIABILITIES


210 000
Accounts payable and accruals
193 398
267 282
210 000
TOTAL LIABILITIES
193 398
267 282
1 982 531
ACCUMULATED FUNDS 3
2 482 069
2 574 005
2 192 531
TOTAL FUNDS EMPLOYED
2 675 467
2 841 287

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 1995

Budget
$
Note
1995
$
1994
$

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash was provided from:


3 019 560
Government grant
3 019 556
2 817 778
12 407
Receipts from customers
20 269
12 460
107 134
Interest
219 644
135 448
3 139 101

3 259 469
2 965 686
3 632 165
Cash was disbursed to:
Suppliers and employees
3 282 931
3 008 812
(493 064)
Net cash used in operating activities 4
(23 462)
(43 126)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash was provided from:


600 000
Investments
75 000
60 000
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
1 433
600 000

76 433
60 000
50 000
Cash was applied to:
Purchase of fixed assets
23 417
23 992
50 000

23 417
23 992
550 000
Net cash from investing activities
53 016
36 008
56 936
Net increase (decrease) in cash held
29 554
(7 118)
103 580
Add opening cash balance
103 580
110 698
160 516
Closing cash balance carried forward
133 134
103 580
10 516
Represented by:
BNZ Current Account
8 134
3 580
150 000
BNZ Call Account
125 000
100 000
160 516

133 134
103 580

STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

1 Reporting entity

The financial statements presented here for the reporting entity, the Law Commission, are prepared pursuant to section 17 of the Law Commission Act 1985 and section 41(1) of the Public Finance Act 1989.

2 Measurement system

The accounting principles recognised as appropriate for the measurement and reporting of results and financial position on an historical cost basis have been applied.

3 Accounting policies

4 Changes in accounting policies

There have been no changes in accounting policies. All policies have been applied on bases consistent with those used in previous years. Comparative figures have been restated where necessary to conform to the current year presentation.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 1995

1 Short term investments
Maturity
1995
$
1994
$
One month
950 000
1 775 000
Two months
500 000
Three months
750 000
Four months
500 000

2 200 000
2 275 000

Interest rates for deposits maturing in one month range from 9.20% to 9.55%. Interest rates for deposits maturing in two and three months are 9.00% and 9.05% respectively. The fair value of financial instruments is equivalent to the carrying amount disclosed in the Statement of Financial Position.

2 Fixed assets

1995

Cost
$
Accumulated
Depreciation
$
Book
Value
$
Computer equipment
393 918
348 506
45 412
Foundation library
185 643
185 643
Furniture and fittings
939 591
922 630
16 961
Office equipment
76 114
66 242
9 872

1 595 266
1 337 378
257 888





1994

Cost
$
Accumulated
depreciation
$
Book
value
$
Computer equipment
384 458
268 575
115 883
Foundation library
185 643
185 643
Furniture and fittings
935 824
867 131
68 693
Office equipment
69 425
58 762
10 663

1 575 350
1 194 468
380 882

3 Accumulated funds

1995
$
1994
$
Balance at 1/7/94
2 574 005
2 797 718
Excess expenditure over income
(91 936)
(223 713)
Balance at 30/6/95
2 482 069
2 574 005

4 Reconciliation of statement of financial performance to statement of cash flows


1995
$
1994
$
Excess income over expenditure

(91 936)
(223 713)
Profit sale of assets
(1 433)


Depreciation
146 410
144 977
143 839


53 041
(79 874)




Movements in working capital



Decrease in accounts receivable
2 824

18 351
Increase in prepayments
(11 775)

(1 552)
Decrease in interest receivable
792

(16 887)
Decrease in GST
5 539

(8 193)
Decrease in accounts payable
(73 883)
(76 503)
45 029
Net cash flow used in operating activities

(23 462)
(42 946)

5 Commitments
Non-cancellable operating leases for rental of accommodation and office equipment.

1995
$
1994
$
One to two years
1 066 108
994 514
Two to five years
524 271
994 514
Beyond five years

1 590 379
1 989 028

6 Contingencies

There were no material contingent liabilities as at balance date (1994 $nil).

STATEMENT OF SERVICE PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 1995

Output class: Policy advice

Estimated Expenditure:
(excluding GST)
$3 725 034
Actual Expenditure:
(excluding GST)
$3 349 214

Statement of objectives for 1994/95
Performance measures
Outputs produced
The Law Commission’s objectives are:


Projects
Projects
Projects
To carry through their various stages towards final report the projects for the reform and development of particular areas of law which have been included in the Commission’s programme.
Quantity
The number of projects included in the Commission’s programme is to be as determined by the Commission, taking account of section 7 of the Law Commission Act 1985.
The number of publications to be produced, or amount of other work to be done, within each project, is to be as set out in project plans approved by the Commission.
Quantity
The projects on the Commission’s programme during the period were
(a) those included in the programme as at l July 1994 (listed in the Commission’s report for the year ended 30 June 1994);
(b) a project on Women’s Access to Justice, added to the programme in May 1995 following extensive preliminary activity which began in September 1994.
The publications produced or other work done in the period 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1995 (including the preliminary activity on Women’s Access to Justice) were as set out in project plans approved by the Commission. During the period the Commission approved modifications to some plans to take account of changed priorities or developments within the project itself.
See narrative account, pages 2 to 10, for a description of all work done.

Quality
The Commission’s project work is to be of the standard set by the Commission, as assured by its internal processes and external review.1
Quality
All the Commission’s project work (including the preliminary activity on Women’s Access to Justice) was performed to the standard set by the Commission, as assured by its internal processes and external review.1

Time
The time for the production of project work is to be as set out in approved project plans.
Time
The time taken for the production of project work (including the preliminary activity on Women’s Access to Justice) was as set out in approved project plans, with such modifications as the Commission approved to take account of changed priorities or developments within the project itself.

Cost
The cost of project work is to be within the approved project budget.
Cost
The Commission set individual project budgets for all work to be done (including the preliminary activity on Women’s Access to Justice) in the period 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1995 (or beyond if the budgeted phase of the project was to extend beyond the end of the financial year). Time and other expenditure was recorded against the project budget, and the Commission received regular (monthly) reports of actual time and cost against the project budget. The Commission’s expenditure on its projects as a whole was $2,532,496.2
Follow-up


To follow up all final reports by
  • taking part in discussions with interested individuals and groups, privately and in public forums, on the meaning and effect of the Commission’s recommendations,
  • discussing with relevant Ministers and their Departments the nature and the timing of the steps necessary to implement the Commission’s recommendations, and
  • participating in appropriate ways in the preparation of legislation implementing the Commission’s recommendations and in the parliamentary processes leading to its enactment.
Quantity
Follow-up is to
  • be discussed at the regular policy meetings between the Law Commission and the Department of Justice;
  • be discussed with the Minister of Justice, other Ministers or departments and parliamentary select committees as requested, or on the Commission’s initiative where appropriate;
  • involve participation in, or the convening of, seminars and conferences as appropriate and as opportunity offers.2
Quantity
Follow-up included
  • regular discussions and correspondence with the Minister of Justice, the Leader of the House, and the Department of Justice about the inclusion in the Government’s legislative programme of draft Acts recommended by the Law Commission;
  • submissions to the Social Services Select Committee in connection with the Commission’s recommendations on Community Safety: Mental Health and Criminal Justice Issues (NZLC R30).
See narrative account, pages 10 to 12, for a description of all work done.

Quality
To the Commission’s standards, as assured by its internal processes and external review.1
Quality
All follow-up work was performed to the Commission’s standards, as assured by its internal processes and external review.1

Time
As agreed, or otherwise at a time enabling the follow-up work to be effective, taking account of the Government’s legislative programme, the parliamentary timetable and other relevant factors.
Time
All follow-up work was undertaken as agreed, or otherwise at a time enabling it to be effective, taking account of the Government’s legislative programme, the parliamentary timetable and other relevant factors.

Cost
Within the budget for follow-up.
Cost
The Commission did not set a separate budget for follow-up for the 1994/95 financial year, but Commissioner and research officer time spent on discrete aspects of follow-up was charged to that output. The Commission’s expenditure on follow-up as a whole was $67,787.2,3
Advisory work


To provide advice, in accordance with s 5(l)(c) of the Law Commission Act 1985, on proposals by other agencies for the review or reform of the law.
Quantity
Advice is to be provided on proposals
  • referred to the Law Commission by the Minister of Justice, other Ministers or select committees, and, to the extent that resources permit, by other government agencies, and
  • on the Commission’s initiative where the proposals bear on the Commission’s project work or Commission involvement is an important step in achieving the Commission’s purpose and objectives.4
Quantity
The Commission received 87 new requests for advice from Cabinet Ministers, departments and select committees and other sources in the year to 30 June 1995.
See narrative account, page 12, for a summary of work done.

Quality
To the Commission’s standards as assured by its internal processes and external review.1
Quality
All advice was provided to the Commission’s standards as assured by its internal processes and external review.1

Time
As agreed with the recipient, or otherwise at a time enabling the advice to be taken into account and acted upon within the timeframe of the recipient.
Time
All advice was provided as agreed with the recipient, or otherwise at a time enabling the advice to be taken into account and acted upon within the timeframe of the recipient.

Cost
Within the budget for advisory work.
Cost
The Commission set a budget of $484,795 for advisory work for the 1994/95 financial year. All Commissioner and research officer time spent on advisory work was charged to that output. The Commission’s expenditure on advisory work was $546,434.2
Legislation Advisory Committee


The output is the contribution to the work of the Legislation Advisory Committee to be provided by Sir Kenneth Keith in his capacity as a member of the Committee, the assistance of the Commission’s research and secretarial staff and the office accommodation made available for the Chairman of the Committee, Dr Mervyn Probine.
Quantity
As agreed with the Committee, subject to the availability of the Commission’s resources.
Quantity
The work done was as agreed with the Committee.
See narrative account, pages 12 to 13, for a description of all work done.
Quality
To the Commission’s standards as assured by its internal processes and external review.1
Quality
All work was performed to the Commission’s standards as assured by its internal processes and external review.1
Time
As agreed with the Committee.
Time
All work was done within a timeframe agreed with the Committee.
Cost
To be within the Commission’s budget for its contribution to the work of the Legislation Advisory Committee.
Cost
The Commission set a budget of $172,615 for its contribution to the work of the Legislation Advisory Committee for the 1994/95 financial year. All Commissioner and research officer time spent on that contribution was charged to that output. The Commission’s expenditure on the output as a whole was $202,497.2, 5

Notes to the Statement of Service Performance

1 In the case of the Commission’s project work, external review involves both the use of expert consultants—to contribute to the writing, or to consider and comment on successive drafts—and also wide consultation with interested agencies and groups. In the early stages of a project, external review is directed at the project outline, the issues to be addressed, and (in the case of the project on Women’s Access to Justice) the project terms of reference themselves. In the advanced stages of a project, external consultants contribute to the writing of, or consider and comment on drafts of, publications. Drafts are also frequently circulated to interested agencies and groups before publication. In most cases, a discussion paper is published and widely circulated, and submissions on it are invited and considered before the preparation of a final report which itself contains a description of the consultation process followed in the particular case.

Reports are published, tabled in Parliament and copies are distributed to interested or affected individuals and groups, including major law firms. They are submitted to appropriate legal journals for review, and a great deal of informal feedback is received from Ministers and parliamentary select committees, legal and other professional societies, judges, members of the legal profession, and law reform agencies, interested bodies and individuals in other countries.

In the case of follow-up, advisory work and assistance to the Legislation Advisory Committee, external review consists of the informal feedback received in the course of any consultations with officials or others (including the Legislation Committee of the New Zealand Law Society) outside the Law Commission in the course of preparing the submission, advice or other document, or received from the recipient, together with evidence of the extent to which the submission, advice or other document is accepted and acted upon.

2 The Commission received regular (monthly) reports on the quantity and timeliness of all work done and on actual costs, as compared with budgeted costs, for each phase of its projects, for advisory work, and for assistance to the Legislation Advisory Committee.

3 For budgetary purposes, the Commission’s follow-up work is treated as if it were a single consolidated project. The Director received regular reports on the actual costs charged to particular items within the follow-up output.

4 For administrative and budgetary purposes, the Commission’s advisory work is treated as though it were a single, consolidated project. A budget is allocated in advance and resources organised so as to make one member of the research staff primarily available for advisory work. It is not always possible, however, to foresee the specific occasions on which the Commission will be asked (or will consider it appropriate) to provide advice and, consequently, what other research resources will have to be allocated to advisory work. Therefore the specification of quantity relates to the number of requests received and other items undertaken which bear on project work or enhance the achievement of the Commission’s purpose and objectives.

5 For budgetary purposes, the Commission’s contribution to the work of the Legislation Advisory Committee is treated as if it were a single consolidated project.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT OFFICE TO THE READERS OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE LAW COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 1995

We have audited the financial statements on pages 19 to 31. The financial statements provide information about the past financial and service performance of the Law Commission and its financial position as at 30 June 1995. This information is stated in accordance with the accounting policies set out on page 23.

Responsibilities of the Law Commission

The Public Finance Act 1989 requires the Law Commission to prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice which fairly reflect the financial position of the Law Commission as at 30 June 1995, the results of operations and cash flows and the achievements as measured against performance targets and other measures by which the Law Commission can be judged in relation to its objectives for the year ended 30 June 1995.

Auditor’s Responsibilities

Section 43(1) of the Public Finance Act 1989 requires the Audit Office to audit the financial statements presented by the Members. It is the responsibility of the Audit Office to express an independent opinion on the financial statements and report its opinion to you.

The Controller and Auditor-General has appointed H C Lim of Audit New Zealand to undertake the audit.

Basis of Opinion

An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. It also includes assessing:

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in New Zealand. We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the information and explanations which we considered necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatements, whether caused by fraud or error. In forming our opinion, we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the financial statements.

Other than in our capacity as auditor acting on behalf of the Controller and Auditor-General, we have no relationship with or interests in the Law Commission.

Unqualified Opinion

We have obtained all the information and explanations we have required.

In our opinion the financial statements of the Law Commission on pages 19 to 31

– the financial position as at 30 June 1995
– the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended on that date; and
– the achievements as measured against the performance targets and other measures adopted for the year ended 30 June 1995.

Our audit was completed on 27 October 1995 and our unqualified opinion is expressed as at that date.

H C Lim

Audit New Zealand

On behalf of the Controller and Auditor-General

Wellington, New Zealand


NZLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/report/R33/R33-Part-2.html