[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
New Zealand Law Commission |
[Database Search] [Name Search] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]
The Law Commission is funded from money appropriated by Parliament.
For the year under review the Commission budgeted to operate at a deficit, funding the shortfall in income from its reserves. The Commission’s deficit budgeting strategy is designed to enable it to achieve its planned long-term operating level. The Commission’s reserves will be used in the coming year in a capital replacement programme and to meet part of its operating deficit. An increase in the annual appropriation may be necessary to enable the Commission to sustain its strategic operating goals.
In the 1994/95 year the Commission budgeted for operating expenditure of $3 725 034 of which $3 019 560 was to be provided by way of appropriation and $705 474 from other income and reserves.
The Commission’s actual operating expenditure was $3 349 214 of which $3 019 566 was by way of appropriation and $329 658 from other income and reserves.
The financial statements for the year ended 30 June 1995 follow.
STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY
We acknowledge responsibility for the preparation of these financial statements and for the judgments used herein.
We acknowledge responsibility for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of the Commission’s financial reporting.
In our opinion these annual financial statements fairly reflect the financial position and operations of the Law Commission for the year ended 30 June 1995.
K J Keith
|
J E Lett
|
President
|
Finance Manager
|
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 1995
Budget
$
|
Note
|
1995
$
|
1994
$
|
|
INCOME
|
|
|
3 019 560
|
Government grant
|
3 019 556
|
2 817 778
|
105 000
|
Interest received
|
218 852
|
152 334
|
9 000
|
Sale of publications
|
17 437
|
12 048
|
–
|
Miscellaneous
|
1 433
|
–
|
3 133 560
|
Total income
|
3 257 278
|
2 982 160
|
|
EXPENDITURE
|
|
|
1 968 554
|
Personnel
|
1 944 024
|
1 655 866
|
147 000
|
Research and consultation
|
130 133
|
164 684
|
160 000
|
Publications
|
51 748
|
121 913
|
130 000
|
Travel
|
110 587
|
120 097
|
189 000
|
Library
|
154 934
|
139 433
|
525 960
|
Rent and rates
|
498 597
|
505 186
|
8 400
|
Audit fees
|
7 000
|
7 000
|
153 120
|
Depreciation
|
146 410
|
143 839
|
283 000
|
Services and supplies
|
248 727
|
227 278
|
160 000
|
Professional services
|
57 054
|
120 577
|
3 725 034
|
Total Expenditure
|
3 349 214
|
3 205 873
|
(591 474)
|
Deficit for year 3/4
|
(91 936)
|
(223 713)
|
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE 1995
Budget
$
|
Note
|
1995
$
|
1994
$
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
10 516
|
Bank of New Zealand
|
8 134
|
3 580
|
150 000
|
Call deposits
|
125 000
|
100 000
|
1 675 000
|
Short-term deposits 1
|
2 200 000
|
2 275 000
|
1 000
|
Accounts receivable
|
1 583
|
4 407
|
23 253
|
Prepayments
|
30 621
|
18 846
|
40 000
|
Interest receivable
|
41 342
|
42 134
|
15 000
|
Goods and services tax
|
10 899
|
16 438
|
1 914 769
|
|
2 417 579
|
2 460 405
|
277 762
|
FIXED ASSETS 2
|
257 888
|
380 882
|
2 192 531
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
2 675 467
|
2 841 287
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
210 000
|
Accounts payable and accruals
|
193 398
|
267 282
|
210 000
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
193 398
|
267 282
|
1 982 531
|
ACCUMULATED FUNDS 3
|
2 482 069
|
2 574 005
|
2 192 531
|
TOTAL FUNDS EMPLOYED
|
2 675 467
|
2 841 287
|
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 1995
Budget
$
|
Note
|
1995
$
|
1994
$
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash was provided from:
|
|
|
3 019 560
|
Government grant
|
3 019 556
|
2 817 778
|
12 407
|
Receipts from customers
|
20 269
|
12 460
|
107 134
|
Interest
|
219 644
|
135 448
|
3 139 101
|
|
3 259 469
|
2 965 686
|
3 632 165
|
Cash was disbursed to:
Suppliers and employees
|
3 282 931
|
3 008 812
|
(493 064)
|
Net cash used in operating activities 4
|
(23 462)
|
(43 126)
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash was provided from:
|
|
|
600 000
|
Investments
|
75 000
|
60 000
|
–
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
1 433
|
–
|
600 000
|
|
76 433
|
60 000
|
50 000
|
Cash was applied to:
Purchase of fixed assets
|
23 417
|
23 992
|
50 000
|
|
23 417
|
23 992
|
550 000
|
Net cash from investing activities
|
53 016
|
36 008
|
56 936
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash held
|
29 554
|
(7 118)
|
103 580
|
Add opening cash balance
|
103 580
|
110 698
|
160 516
|
Closing cash balance carried forward
|
133 134
|
103 580
|
10 516
|
Represented by:
BNZ Current Account
|
8 134
|
3 580
|
150 000
|
BNZ Call Account
|
125 000
|
100 000
|
160 516
|
|
133 134
|
103 580
|
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1 Reporting entity
The financial statements presented here for the reporting entity, the Law Commission, are prepared pursuant to section 17 of the Law Commission Act 1985 and section 41(1) of the Public Finance Act 1989.
2 Measurement system
The accounting principles recognised as appropriate for the measurement and reporting of results and financial position on an historical cost basis have been applied.
3 Accounting policies
4 Changes in accounting policies
There have been no changes in accounting policies. All policies have been applied on bases consistent with those used in previous years. Comparative figures have been restated where necessary to conform to the current year presentation.
1 Short term investments
|
||
Maturity
|
1995
$
|
1994
$
|
One month
|
950 000
|
1 775 000
|
Two months
|
500 000
|
–
|
Three months
|
750 000
|
–
|
Four months
|
–
|
500 000
|
|
2 200 000
|
2 275 000
|
Interest rates for deposits maturing in one month range from 9.20% to 9.55%. Interest rates for deposits maturing in two and three months are 9.00% and 9.05% respectively. The fair value of financial instruments is equivalent to the carrying amount disclosed in the Statement of Financial Position.
2 Fixed assets
|
|||
|
1995
|
||
|
Cost
$
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
$
|
Book
Value
$
|
Computer equipment
|
393 918
|
348 506
|
45 412
|
Foundation library
|
185 643
|
–
|
185 643
|
Furniture and fittings
|
939 591
|
922 630
|
16 961
|
Office equipment
|
76 114
|
66 242
|
9 872
|
|
1 595 266
|
1 337 378
|
257 888
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994
|
||
|
Cost
$
|
Accumulated
depreciation
$
|
Book
value
$
|
Computer equipment
|
384 458
|
268 575
|
115 883
|
Foundation library
|
185 643
|
–
|
185 643
|
Furniture and fittings
|
935 824
|
867 131
|
68 693
|
Office equipment
|
69 425
|
58 762
|
10 663
|
|
1 575 350
|
1 194 468
|
380 882
|
3 Accumulated funds
|
||
|
1995
$
|
1994
$
|
Balance at 1/7/94
|
2 574 005
|
2 797 718
|
Excess expenditure over income
|
(91 936)
|
(223 713)
|
Balance at 30/6/95
|
2 482 069
|
2 574 005
|
4 Reconciliation of statement of financial performance to statement of
cash flows
|
|||
|
|
1995
$
|
1994
$
|
Excess income over expenditure
|
|
(91 936)
|
(223 713)
|
Profit sale of assets
|
(1 433)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
146 410
|
144 977
|
143 839
|
|
|
53 041
|
(79 874)
|
|
|
|
|
Movements in working capital
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable
|
2 824
|
|
18 351
|
Increase in prepayments
|
(11 775)
|
|
(1 552)
|
Decrease in interest receivable
|
792
|
|
(16 887)
|
Decrease in GST
|
5 539
|
|
(8 193)
|
Decrease in accounts payable
|
(73 883)
|
(76 503)
|
45 029
|
Net cash flow used in operating activities
|
|
(23 462)
|
(42 946)
|
5 Commitments
|
||
Non-cancellable operating leases for rental of accommodation and office
equipment.
|
||
|
1995
$
|
1994
$
|
One to two years
|
1 066 108
|
994 514
|
Two to five years
|
524 271
|
994 514
|
Beyond five years
|
–
|
–
|
|
1 590 379
|
1 989 028
|
6 Contingencies
There were no material contingent liabilities as at balance date (1994 $nil).
Output class: Policy advice
Estimated Expenditure:
(excluding GST)
|
$3 725 034
|
Actual Expenditure:
(excluding GST)
|
$3 349 214
|
Statement of objectives for 1994/95
|
Performance measures
|
Outputs produced
|
The Law Commission’s objectives are:
|
|
|
Projects
|
Projects
|
Projects
|
To carry through their various stages towards final report the projects for
the reform and development of particular areas of law which have been included
in the Commission’s programme.
|
Quantity
The number of projects included in the Commission’s programme is to
be as determined by the Commission, taking account of section 7 of the Law
Commission Act 1985.
The number of publications to be produced, or amount of other work to be
done, within each project, is to be as set out in project plans approved by the
Commission.
|
Quantity
The projects on the Commission’s programme during the period
were
(a) those included in the programme as at l July 1994 (listed in the
Commission’s report for the year ended 30 June 1994);
(b) a project on Women’s Access to Justice, added to the programme in
May 1995 following extensive preliminary activity which began in September
1994.
The publications produced or other work done in the period 1 July 1994 to
30 June 1995 (including the preliminary activity on Women’s Access to
Justice) were as set out in project plans approved by the Commission. During the
period the Commission approved modifications to some plans to take account of
changed priorities or developments within the project itself.
See narrative account, pages 2 to 10, for a description of all work done.
|
|
Quality
The Commission’s project work is to be of the standard set by the
Commission, as assured by its internal processes and external
review.1
|
Quality
All the Commission’s project work (including the preliminary activity
on Women’s Access to Justice) was performed to the standard set by the
Commission, as assured by its internal processes and external
review.1
|
|
Time
The time for the production of project work is to be as set out in approved
project plans.
|
Time
The time taken for the production of project work (including the
preliminary activity on Women’s Access to Justice) was as set out in
approved project plans, with such modifications as the Commission approved to
take account of changed priorities or developments within the project
itself.
|
|
Cost
The cost of project work is to be within the approved project budget.
|
Cost
The Commission set individual project budgets for all work to be done
(including the preliminary activity on Women’s Access to Justice) in the
period 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1995 (or beyond if the budgeted phase of the
project was to extend beyond the end of the financial year). Time and other
expenditure was recorded against the project budget, and the Commission received
regular (monthly) reports of actual time and cost against the project budget.
The Commission’s expenditure on its projects as a whole was
$2,532,496.2
|
Follow-up
|
|
|
To follow up all final reports by
|
Quantity
Follow-up is to
|
Quantity
Follow-up included
See narrative account,
pages 10 to 12, for a description of all work done.
|
|
Quality
To the Commission’s standards, as assured by its internal processes
and external review.1
|
Quality
All follow-up work was performed to the Commission’s standards, as
assured by its internal processes and external review.1
|
|
Time
As agreed, or otherwise at a time enabling the follow-up work to be
effective, taking account of the Government’s legislative programme, the
parliamentary timetable and other relevant factors.
|
Time
All follow-up work was undertaken as agreed, or otherwise at a time
enabling it to be effective, taking account of the Government’s
legislative programme, the parliamentary timetable and other relevant
factors.
|
|
Cost
Within the budget for follow-up.
|
Cost
The Commission did not set a separate budget for follow-up for the
1994/95 financial year, but Commissioner and research officer time spent on
discrete aspects of follow-up was charged to that output. The
Commission’s expenditure on follow-up as a whole was
$67,787.2,3
|
Advisory work
|
|
|
To provide advice, in accordance with s 5(l)(c) of the Law Commission Act
1985, on proposals by other agencies for the review or reform of the law.
|
Quantity
Advice is to be provided on proposals
|
Quantity
The Commission received 87 new requests for advice from Cabinet Ministers,
departments and select committees and other sources in the year to 30 June 1995.
See narrative account, page 12, for a summary of work done.
|
|
Quality
To the Commission’s standards as assured by its internal processes
and external review.1
|
Quality
All advice was provided to the Commission’s standards as assured by
its internal processes and external review.1
|
|
Time
As agreed with the recipient, or otherwise at a time enabling the advice to
be taken into account and acted upon within the timeframe of the
recipient.
|
Time
All advice was provided as agreed with the recipient, or otherwise at a
time enabling the advice to be taken into account and acted upon within the
timeframe of the recipient.
|
|
Cost
Within the budget for advisory work.
|
Cost
The Commission set a budget of $484,795 for advisory work for the
1994/95 financial year. All Commissioner and research officer time spent on
advisory work was charged to that output. The Commission’s expenditure on
advisory work was $546,434.2
|
Legislation Advisory Committee
|
|
|
The output is the contribution to the work of the Legislation Advisory
Committee to be provided by Sir Kenneth Keith in his capacity as a member of
the Committee, the assistance of the Commission’s research and secretarial
staff and the office accommodation made available for the Chairman of the
Committee, Dr Mervyn Probine.
|
Quantity
As agreed with the Committee, subject to the availability of the
Commission’s resources.
|
Quantity
The work done was as agreed with the Committee.
See narrative account, pages 12 to 13, for a description of all work
done.
|
Quality
To the Commission’s standards as assured by its internal processes
and external review.1
|
Quality
All work was performed to the Commission’s standards as assured by
its internal processes and external review.1
|
|
Time
As agreed with the Committee.
|
Time
All work was done within a timeframe agreed with the Committee.
|
|
Cost
To be within the Commission’s budget for its contribution to the work
of the Legislation Advisory Committee.
|
Cost
The Commission set a budget of $172,615 for its contribution to the work of
the Legislation Advisory Committee for the 1994/95 financial year. All
Commissioner and research officer time spent on that contribution was charged to
that output. The Commission’s expenditure on the output as a whole was
$202,497.2, 5
|
Notes to the Statement of Service Performance
1 In the case of the Commission’s project work, external review involves both the use of expert consultants—to contribute to the writing, or to consider and comment on successive drafts—and also wide consultation with interested agencies and groups. In the early stages of a project, external review is directed at the project outline, the issues to be addressed, and (in the case of the project on Women’s Access to Justice) the project terms of reference themselves. In the advanced stages of a project, external consultants contribute to the writing of, or consider and comment on drafts of, publications. Drafts are also frequently circulated to interested agencies and groups before publication. In most cases, a discussion paper is published and widely circulated, and submissions on it are invited and considered before the preparation of a final report which itself contains a description of the consultation process followed in the particular case.
Reports are published, tabled in Parliament and copies are distributed to interested or affected individuals and groups, including major law firms. They are submitted to appropriate legal journals for review, and a great deal of informal feedback is received from Ministers and parliamentary select committees, legal and other professional societies, judges, members of the legal profession, and law reform agencies, interested bodies and individuals in other countries.
In the case of follow-up, advisory work and assistance to the Legislation Advisory Committee, external review consists of the informal feedback received in the course of any consultations with officials or others (including the Legislation Committee of the New Zealand Law Society) outside the Law Commission in the course of preparing the submission, advice or other document, or received from the recipient, together with evidence of the extent to which the submission, advice or other document is accepted and acted upon.
2 The Commission received regular (monthly) reports on the quantity and timeliness of all work done and on actual costs, as compared with budgeted costs, for each phase of its projects, for advisory work, and for assistance to the Legislation Advisory Committee.
3 For budgetary purposes, the Commission’s follow-up work is treated as if it were a single consolidated project. The Director received regular reports on the actual costs charged to particular items within the follow-up output.
4 For administrative and budgetary purposes, the Commission’s advisory work is treated as though it were a single, consolidated project. A budget is allocated in advance and resources organised so as to make one member of the research staff primarily available for advisory work. It is not always possible, however, to foresee the specific occasions on which the Commission will be asked (or will consider it appropriate) to provide advice and, consequently, what other research resources will have to be allocated to advisory work. Therefore the specification of quantity relates to the number of requests received and other items undertaken which bear on project work or enhance the achievement of the Commission’s purpose and objectives.
5 For budgetary purposes, the Commission’s contribution to the work of the Legislation Advisory Committee is treated as if it were a single consolidated project.
We have audited the financial statements on pages 19 to 31. The financial statements provide information about the past financial and service performance of the Law Commission and its financial position as at 30 June 1995. This information is stated in accordance with the accounting policies set out on page 23.
Responsibilities of the Law Commission
The Public Finance Act 1989 requires the Law Commission to prepare financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice which fairly reflect the financial position of the Law Commission as at 30 June 1995, the results of operations and cash flows and the achievements as measured against performance targets and other measures by which the Law Commission can be judged in relation to its objectives for the year ended 30 June 1995.
Auditor’s Responsibilities
Section 43(1) of the Public Finance Act 1989 requires the Audit Office to audit the financial statements presented by the Members. It is the responsibility of the Audit Office to express an independent opinion on the financial statements and report its opinion to you.
The Controller and Auditor-General has appointed H C Lim of Audit New Zealand to undertake the audit.
Basis of Opinion
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. It also includes assessing:
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in New Zealand. We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the information and explanations which we considered necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatements, whether caused by fraud or error. In forming our opinion, we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the financial statements.
Other than in our capacity as auditor acting on behalf of the Controller and Auditor-General, we have no relationship with or interests in the Law Commission.
Unqualified Opinion
We have obtained all the information and explanations we have required.
In our opinion the financial statements of the Law Commission on pages 19 to 31
– the financial position as at 30 June 1995
– the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended on that date; and
– the achievements as measured against the performance targets and other measures adopted for the year ended 30 June 1995.
Our audit was completed on 27 October 1995 and our unqualified opinion is expressed as at that date.
H C Lim
Audit New Zealand
On behalf of the Controller and Auditor-General
Wellington, New Zealand
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/report/R33/R33-Part-2.html